<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Build A Sniper Affiliate Site – Part 1 – Researching A Keyword</title>
	<atom:link href="http://monetizezone.com/how-to-build-a-sniper-affiliate-site-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://monetizezone.com/how-to-build-a-sniper-affiliate-site-part-1/</link>
	<description>I show people how I make money online!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 03:48:32 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Justin Anfinson</title>
		<link>http://monetizezone.com/how-to-build-a-sniper-affiliate-site-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Anfinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 02:11:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monetizezone.com/?p=250#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Well the way Google describes their &quot;Phrase&quot; option would lead us to believe that we would see the search volume for that specific phrase plus any pre/post terms surrounding it.

Either way, I should&#039;ve mentioned that Google&#039;s numbers a not 100% accurate (even though they are the company conducting their own research on their own search engine). You need to always factor in +/- 1000 to be more realistic.

I did mention a great keyword tool that automates the entire process and is more accurate to my knowledge. I really just wanted to give people a good place to start since that is how I started before I ended up purchasing the software myself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well the way Google describes their &#8220;Phrase&#8221; option would lead us to believe that we would see the search volume for that specific phrase plus any pre/post terms surrounding it.</p>
<p>Either way, I should&#8217;ve mentioned that Google&#8217;s numbers a not 100% accurate (even though they are the company conducting their own research on their own search engine). You need to always factor in +/- 1000 to be more realistic.</p>
<p>I did mention a great keyword tool that automates the entire process and is more accurate to my knowledge. I really just wanted to give people a good place to start since that is how I started before I ended up purchasing the software myself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Guthrie</title>
		<link>http://monetizezone.com/how-to-build-a-sniper-affiliate-site-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Guthrie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 01:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monetizezone.com/?p=250#comment-6</guid>
		<description>If you&#039;re trying to buy a domain name based on a keyword then I&#039;d actually strongly suggest you don&#039;t use Google Adwords tool as you&#039;ve mentioned above. You should use exact because it&#039;s the best way to find out how many searches are performed per month for &quot;my fancy keyword&quot;

If you do broad or phrase you&#039;ll have unreliable data...

My 2 cents

Chris Guthrie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re trying to buy a domain name based on a keyword then I&#8217;d actually strongly suggest you don&#8217;t use Google Adwords tool as you&#8217;ve mentioned above. You should use exact because it&#8217;s the best way to find out how many searches are performed per month for &#8220;my fancy keyword&#8221;</p>
<p>If you do broad or phrase you&#8217;ll have unreliable data&#8230;</p>
<p>My 2 cents</p>
<p>Chris Guthrie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
